I am David Joseph Lango, born July 2, 1958 in Buffalo, N.Y., and I am happy. I’ve been all over the place since, and working for the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is going to be the last stop on my tour of duty. Back in the 1980′s, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries issued me a Users License to set power poles in solid rock with dynamite. I’ve been at the top of a steel tower in the mountains of Oregon, and caught a line from a helicopter. Working line construction out of Local 42 in Connecticut, I used hydraulics to move energized lines for re-conductor, in the City of Bristol. I’ve enjoyed a very colorful, albeit bruising career, in some of the worst weather. Since moving to West Los Angeles in 2004, I don’t miss winter one bit. I made a short movie at work. I’ve been in the same industry since high school, which is rare these days:
I work hard to play hard. Here is yours truly in Sturgis back in 2010:
Happy as all of this is, and this good life I’m living, I see a threat. It’s the enemy. The enemy is the establishment itself.
The establishment threatens everything I am happy about, with their Chemtrails.
The establishment usurped our government in 1913.
The establishment has been desperately trying to rule the entire world for hundreds of years.
The establishment is a clan of Ashkenazi Jews of Mongolian decent that adopted the Hebrew religion hundreds of years ago. In the 1700′s after migrating to Frankfurt, Germany the richest one of them all, changed his name from Mayer Amschel Bauer, to Rothschild. The House of Rothschild attained global dominance after the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo.
This “House of Rothschild” are who invented the Illuminati, invented what we know today as “the media”, starting with Carrier Pigeons, to Reuters acquiring controlling interest in the Associated Press. Achieving complete censorship of all the news the world receives, helped the House of Rothschild to accomplish their disappearance from the world stage. They rule us from the shadows. Some call it Jewish Hegemony. Some call it Zionism and the New World Order. Some consider the power of the House of Rothschild has rendered the Earth into a uni-polar world. I call it “the establishment”. In the end, I suspect China might be the establishment’s undoing.
The Rothschild’s control of the British Pound during the time the Royal Navy deployed the Beagle, for mapping and instrument testing, illustrates how Darwin was the very first “establishment troll”. One doesn’t get “religious training” back in those days, and get an assignment to keep a captain company on a long voyage, unless he’s an asset with a Rothschild handler.
The House of Rothschild invented “pseudo-science”.
How about those dinosaurs? Catching “scientists” creating a fake dinosaur with feathers might be harmless mischief. But the depths of the lies we “Goyim” live with everyday is deadly serious, and is going to kill us if we don’t learn of it enough to stop it. Their tools are things like the “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change”, claiming enough United Nations “authority” to prevent the U.S. from spraying Chemtrails over any other nation but our own.
I define this Oligarchical clan of Ashkenazi ”House of Rothschild” inbreds, as “the establishment”. They’re using Chemtrails to manipulate the weather. It’s causing drought, poisoning the planet, and destroying the ozone.
The establishment controls the global conversation, and it’s still possible to find people who are unaware of Chemtrails. Get them outside on a spray day and make them look at the sky!
Edward Snowden gave up a cushy government job to explain the destruction of our 4th amendment. We’ll all learn about the 3rd amendment only after DHS agents spend the night in our home, eating all our supplies, and collecting our guns and ammunition.
It’s going to be a tough sell to get workers to stop spraying the Chemtrails.
Would you give up a cushy government job with benefits because of your moral convictions? I think Edward Snowden did just that. Susan Lindauer was one of the first arrested using the Patriot Act.
Kristen Meghan is still at it, trying to raise awareness of Chemtrails, to my knowledge, is still getting constant ridicule from establishment media.
Government whistle-blower protection is a farce, and our 1st amendment is destroyed. I remember trying to understand this when I read ”Atomic Harvest”, by Anthony DeAntonio, back in 1993, during the time I reported for duty in Hanford. I signed away my first amendment rights as a condition of employment. My neighbor Mrs. Bailey gave it to me to read when she learned I took a job out in the area. This book reveals the secret culture supported by patriotic citizens during the cold war.
The House of Rothschild has used it’s ability to dictate our foreign policy with ruthless efficiency, leaving a large infrastructure of government in it’s wake everywhere, after every war, for population control. Communism is the religion they would have us all use, that endorses the theory of missing links to dismiss a Creator.
Hollywood celebrates godless immorality. Atheists/Communists are much easier to manage than fanatical religious folk, who are dismissed with the Marx/Lenin cornerstone of “religion is the opium of the people”. Guess what? It is a violation of our civil liberties to deny us any portion of all the opium we want. How about a little bit of that?
Better yet, let’s go back a little further and read the following transcript of President Kennedy’s speech to the press at the Waldorf/Astoria Hotel in N.Y. on April 27, 1961:
“President and the Press” Speech (April 27, 1961)
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:
I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.
You bear heavy responsibilities these days and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession.
You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune, under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.
We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and Managing Editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the “lousiest petty bourgeois cheating.”
But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath to the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the Cold War.
If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper.
I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight “The President and the Press.” Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded “The President Versus the Press.” But those are not my sentiments tonight.
It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.
Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one-party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.
Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family.
If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm.
On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses which they once did.
It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one’s golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man. My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.
I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future—for reducing this threat or living with it—there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security—a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.
This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President—two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.
The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort, based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.
Today no war has been declared—and however fierce the struggle may be—it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.
If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions—by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence—on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security—and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.
For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.
The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.
That question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the Nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.
On many earlier occasions, I have said—and your newspapers have constantly said—that these are times that appeal to every citizen’s sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.
I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.
Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: “Is it news?” All I suggest is that you add the question: “Is it in the interest of the national security?” And I hope that every group in America—unions and businessmen and public officials at every level—will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to this same exacting test.
And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.
Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.
It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation—an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people—to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well—the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.
No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.
I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers—I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for, as a wise man once said: “An error doesn’t become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed—and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian law-maker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment—the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution—not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants”—but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news—for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security—and we intend to do it.
It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world’s efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.
And so it is to the printing press—to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news—that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
I insist JFK described this threat of communism quite well, and all but named the House of Rothschild specifically. It is my opinion that:
****We are still in this “undeclared war”, and the establishment is gaining the upper hand! The House of Rothschild is the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy using covert means to expand it’s sphere of influence!****
I would like to point out that it is the establishment that invented the United Nations, the modern occupation called Israel, and has funded all sides of war for profit for hundreds of years. Considering history and the legacy of The House of Rothschild, who else would command guerrillas to crash aircraft into the twin towers of the World Trade Center? Bush and Cheney didn’t do it, and were only complicit to the extent of establishment’s needs.
If we “follow the money”, it’s safe to conclude that; The House of Rothschild was behind the demolition of all three buildings in N.Y. that day, and the missile hitting the Pentagon. 9/11/2001 is the foundation for all our modern illicit war and tyranny at home.
The establishment loathes the citizens of the United States of America, considers us all “Goyim”, and is in an all-out, no-holds-barred, undeclared war against our way of life. It’s hatred and warmongering is the true prejudice in the world, and it is the House of Rothschild that invented the term “anti-Semitic”, to hide their true identity. The establishment uses it’s power to win the battle for our gullible minds by any means it can invent. Television is used with brutal effectiveness. We only vote for one of the two puppets that they invite to their “debate”, to create the illusion of choice.
We need word of mouth. We need to vote for slogans like “End the Fed”.
The establishment is the enemy.
The establishment lies to us in the news with impunity. The Chemtrails are bad. It needs to stop to see if Earth can heal. Not letting the weather man on TV talk about Chemtrails is the same as a LIE.
This my effort toward honest investigative journalism. I have embedded a collection of video testimony and evidence. My own opinion is an editorial that I continue to update and correct, when I learn I am wrong about something, and when I discover new evidence.
We declared independence from the establishment in 1776. It started the Revolutionary War.
After the War of 1812, Nathan Rothschild declared he cared not who made a nation’s laws as long as he controlled that nation’s currency.
President Andrew Jackson at long last killed the establishment’s bank in 1833, and our independence was finally won.
Establishment historians consider Jackson our worst President because he killed the establishment’s bank. The House of Rothschild tipped the global apple cart over, to punish the United States with sanctions for that. It was the birth of our industrial revolution. Necessity was the mother of invention.
Our first amendment protection of a free press was undermined during this period by the House of Rothschild’s ability to censor the news. The establishment attained the ability to print lies in the news with impunity with their control of Reuters. Honest investigative journalism was under attack from the beginning. I am still looking for evidence if the establishment had a hand in the Civil War. I would be surprised if lies in the news weren’t being used to create the context for war. It’s the family business.
“Although he frequently lambasted magnates such as JP Morgan and the Vanderbilts in public, in private Hearst entered into partnership with them in lucrative ventures such as the Cerro de Pasco mines in Peru.”
I don’t suppose Hearst had any obligation to publish a few establishment talking points along the way?
I am trying to illustrate the thorough and complete control the establishment has over the global conversation. Though we didn’t start this fire, I feel we should all understand it, and learn what the matter is. We can’t fix anything until we expose the establishment lies that dominate the conversation.
Syria is still in control of their own currency (it’s true, Syria does not have a “Fed”), so the media will continue to spin up lies to create the context for war there.
Russia sees a Zionist effort in Ukraine and resists, so Putin is spun up to be worse than Hitler.
Fact is, I’m embarrassed to admit I wish we could trade Presidents. Putin seems to have a moral compass. Obama appears to celebrate the immorality of Sodom and Gomorrah, Communism, Big Government Tyranny, with a pass toward Islam.
Islam has political agenda sewn into it’s doctrine. Islam should be outlawed in the United States for this reason, to abide the separation of church and state. A religion that has political agenda as part of it’s doctrine, should never be allowed any influence over the ability of sovereign States to govern themselves.
Obama is the puppet that the Zionist Oligarchy chose for us at their Bilderberg Meeting. The House of Rothschild conducts these Bilderberg Meetings to pick presidents and world leaders, and dictate the edicts of their agenda, that Soros and Bloomberg and Netanyahu so reverently obey.
So along with Islam, we need to discard Zionism’s political influence over our effort to govern ourselves as a nation. We need to invite everyone in Tel Aviv here to the States where there is freedom of religion, and outlaw “Zionism” at the same time. The United States’ foreign policy was hijacked in a coup described well enough by Retired General Wesley Clark:
Zionism is also in direct conflict with a separation of church and state.
The House of Rothschild is the private entity that owns our Federal Reserve Bank, and the politicians that borrow it’s money are beholden to it’s agenda. The Fed is where our horrible foreign policy comes from.
The Federal Reserve Act was the brainchild of Baron Alfred Rothschild of London. The final version of the Act was decided on at a secret meeting at Jekyll Island Georgia, owned by J.P. Morgan.
It is the establishment itself, that usurped our government in 1913, is who the enemy is. Each administration since has been led down the garden path, and President John F. Kennedy was the only President in the last hundred years that tried to end the Fed.
We are not supposed to have a Federal Reserve Bank. We’re not supposed to have an Internal Revenue Service. click here to learn about the IRS
“End the Fed”, by Ron Paul, should be required reading in school.
This undeclared war upon us all, is boiling down to global depopulation. The establishment wishes to kill us off. The Illuminati (Rothschild invented the Illuminati) carved “less than five hundred million” into the Georgia Guide Stones.
Poisoning the planet with Chemtrails is accomplished right over our heads in plain (plane) view. I am seeing them start and stop now, like in skywriting, over Southern California.
Folks handling the nano-aluminum are spraying it to block out the Sun. They believe they are fighting “global warming”. Chemtrails is a big secret business. Workers are told it’s a “benevolent” mission. It’s wiping out the ozone and poisoning the planet. Monsanto is selling “aluminum resistant” seed for crops. Chemtrails cause drought. The establishment controls the weather at will, in secret. Manipulating the weather for greed and war in secret since WWII, has taken it’s toll.
According to Dane Wigington, Chemtrails have already caused irreversible damage to Earth’s atmosphere.
Is the establishment destroying the Earth in an effort to depopulate it according to their Illuminati mandate, carved into the Georgia Guide Stones, to be less than 500 million? Is the House of Rothschild suffering some sort of self loathing syndrome? Why would you torpedo your own ship? Are they from Mars?
When I learned of all this, I decided I am not going quietly into the night. I don’t like these numbers, we’re at 7 billion now. No studies if Earth could support a trillion thriving humans enjoying liberty so we can go forth and multiply, none of that. Only depopulation. It’s the bottom line of the establishment. I don’t like what I see. What I’ve learned is troubling. I’ve decided No FEMA camp for me!
Greetings. My name is David Lango. I have a lot to be thankful for. I’ll introduce you to my Smith and Wesson here in this video the range officer took at the Kernville gun range:
Below is a photo of my first letter to President Obama in our mailbox. I took this picture soon after I met Dr. Ron Paul, May 1, 2012. It was a fundraising event held at the Ayres Hotel, right off the Rosecrans exit from the 405 here in Los Angeles. It was a political awakening for myself. With expanded horizons and greater understanding, I sat down and wrote the President, and was proud enough of my effort, and was inspired to use this photo at the start of this web page.
The illegitimate establishment that would have us all unarmed in public so the bureaucrats can more easily enjoy their double standard of liberty and privacy; wants the rest of us to turn ourselves in and sign up for obamacare. How about those Chemtrails?
Don’t assume our own government isn’t capable of harming us all. Here’s a guy who has been a whistle-blower for a long time, who has this to say about Chemtrails:
‘Contrary to rumors of “conspiracy theory”, the Department of Defense first published “Chemtrails” in 1990 as the title to a chemistry course for new pilots attending the esteemed US Air Force Academy.
It’s reasonable to speculate that “Chemtrails”, and its implied meaning was eventually adopted by civilian observers to describe unusual military jet contrail emissions and later, commercial aircraft persistent contrails.
In etymological terms, the origin of a word is very important. Regardless the intended definition, history clearly shows the term “Chemtrails” originated at the US Department of Defense as the title for a Chemistry manual used at the Air Force Academy cadet training program in the early 1990′s.’ – David Icke
If however, you believe everything you find in YouTube, and accept everything in print as fact, and fail to question authority, I have a button you can “click” down below, to illustrate how a fool and his money are soon parted! If you want the details on “over-unity” power sources, or instructions on how to tap the “aether”, or how to reconfigure that Tesla coil, to reap the benefits of “spirit science”, send all of your money off using the button below. It’s the only way you’re going to learn about fraud. I’ll keep it all. I will! If I get enough I’ll pay off our national debt.
Do not click the ‘Donate’ button, save your money. I’m fine. It wouldn’t even be tax deductible. I can afford to host this page on my own, and I do so because my conscience compels me to weigh in.
STOP BORROWING MONEY!
Believe your eyes, not the lies. The next three videos are clips from James Kosior’s film footage of 9/11, “Tuesday morning in September”. Jim started rolling tape from New Jersey after the North Tower was puffing smoke.
Burning jet fuel cannot melt steel, not even with bellows.
Otherwise a jet engine wouldn’t work.
We all should write to our locally elected Sheriffs in support of the Second Amendment. People will stick up for their rights more readily if their Sheriff has their back, and vice verso. Sadly, Connecticut disbanded the Sheriff’s Department altogether, and doesn’t even have one. Delaware stripped the Sheriff of his ability to make an arrest! If we don’t have an elected Sheriff, who is going to represent the citizens when the Fed comes to town with force? We’re not supposed to have this kind of tyranny! Our locally elected Sheriff could easily defeat any “terrorist threat” by calling the community to arms. It’s called a militia. And we’re now seeing an army standing on the neck of our militia. The Department of Homeland Security is wrong. Government does not create jobs, it makes subjects.
I want to know what kind of thug would obey an order to round up cattle from Cliven Bundy’s ranch in Nevada? We need to explain to these people empowered by the gov’t to bully us, that there are unconstitutional orders they should not obey! Senator Harry Reid made a deal with Communist China and is using a tortoise and EPA authority to steal land, and kill cattle by running them to death with helicopters during spring calving, and give land a family of ranchers used for over a hundred years, to Communist China. The growth of the establishment’s government infrastructure outlawed our own cowboys, and wants to give the land to China, because Harry Reid’s opinion is governed by the establishment’s duress, and it wants China to have some equity for it’s tremendous holdings of our national debt.
How many examples do we need of the power that debt has to rob us and steal our self determination?
Small Arms Treaty
International Criminal Court
Law of the Seas Treaty
U.N. convention on the rights of a child
European Code of Conduct for Outer Space
If you read this far, then you need some comic relief. Have a laugh:
Texas, California, and the Tale of the Coyote
January 14, 2011 by Dan Mitchell
CALIFORNIA: The Governor of California is jogging with his dog along a nature trail. A coyote jumps out, bites the Governor and attacks his dog.
1. The Governor starts to intervene, but reflects upon the movie “Bambi” and then realizes he should stop; the coyote is only doing what is natural.
2. He calls animal control. Animal Control captures the coyote and bills the State $200 testing it for diseases and $500 for relocating it.
3. He calls a veterinarian. The vet collects the dead dog and bills the State $200 for testing it for diseases.
4. The Governor goes to hospital and spends $3,500 getting checked for diseases from the coyote and on getting his bite wound bandaged.
5. The running trail gets shut down for 6 months while Fish & Game conducts a $100,000 survey to make sure the area is free of dangerous animals.
6. The Governor spends $50,000 in state funds to implement a “coyote awareness” program for residents of the area.
7. The State Legislature spends $2 million to study how to better treat rabies and how to permanently eradicate the disease throughout the world.
8. The Governor’s security agent is fired for not stopping the attack somehow and for letting the Governor attempt to intervene.
9. Additional cost to State of California: $75,000 to hire and train a new security agent with additional special training re: the nature of coyotes.
10. PETA protests the coyote’s relocation and files suit against the State.
TEXAS: The Governor of Texas is jogging with his dog along a nature trail. A Coyote jumps out, bites the Governor’s leather boot, and attacks his dog.
1. The Governor shoots the coyote with his State-issued pistol and keeps jogging. The Governor has spent $0.50 on a .45 ACP hollow
2. The buzzards eat the dead coyote.
And that, boys and girls, is why California is broke………..And, more importantly, why too much government doesn’t work.
“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” — Thomas Jefferson.
I recommend starting at the top. http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/write-or-call
Let us start the paper trail. Let us all write the President. You can copy what I sent below, if you prefer not to create your own “stop the wars” letter, but I recommend after a copy and paste, that you at least edit it to your liking, for the sake of originality:
(always put your name and address at the top of your letter, and the date)
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington DC 20500
The foreign policy of the United States of America has been bad for a long time.
Unconstitutional foreign entanglements are the cause of events like 09-11-2001. Good job hunting down and killing Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan.
It is important to now repair our bad foreign policy. Bring all of our troops home to defend our country, protect our territorial waters, and secure our borders.
Reopen our military bases, and close all military bases abroad.
Stop all foreign aid. End foreign entanglements!
Return any attack on our country with such force as to end it quickly.
(sign your name)
Right after I sent this letter, “1600 Pennsylvania Avenue” added me as a contact on YouTube. Some time went by after that and then President Obama wrote me back! It’s official with the Seal of the U.S. pressed into the paper, and appears to be personally signed!
Thank you for writing. I have heard from many Americans about our Nation’s foreign policy, and I appreciate your perspective. As President, my highest priority is the safety of the American people. My Administration is using every element of our national power to keep our country secure, prosperous, and free. We have renewed our leadership in the world by strengthening old alliances and forging new partnerships to meet common challenges-from preventing terrorist attacks, reversing the global economic crisis, and responding to pandemic disease to confronting climate change, preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, and providing relief from natural crises. After more than a decade of sacrifice, the tide of war is finally turning. The war in Iraq is over. The number of our troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and more will soon be coming home. In Afghanistan, we have begun a transition to Afghan responsibility for security, and we have a clear path to fulfill our mission. That is why, on May 2, 2012, I signed a historic Strategic Partnership Agreement between our countries as the war comes to an end. As in Iraq, we are building an enduring partnership to strengthen Afghan sovereignty and stability while advancing our shared goal of delivering justice to al-Qa’ida’s leadership-taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders, including Osama bin Laden. The goal I set to defeat al-Qa’ida and deny it the chance to rebuild is now within our reach. The courage and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform has promoted peace and prosperity from Germany to Korea and enabled democracy to take hold in places like Libya. Our commitment to global security will never waver, but in a world in which threats are more diffuse and missions are more complex, America cannot act alone. We will continue to align our policies with those with whom we share common values and interests. That is why NATO remains indispensable to our security. At the NATO Summit I hosted in May 2012, we took steps to ensure the Alliance has the capabilities it needs to meet 21st-century threats. At the same time, we must also strengthen the United Nations and regional peacekeeping capabilities. America will remain committed to governments that reflect the will of their people. I have an unyielding belief that all people share some basic aspirations: to support our families, to maintain the freedom to choose our leaders, to worship as we please, and to live in peace and security. These are not just American ideas: they are human rights-and we will support them everywhere. I know the challenges faced by the international community can be met if we commit ourselves to a sustained effort to secure the universal human rights of freedom and dignity for all our children. To learn more about our foreign policy, please visit http://www.WhiteHouse.gov/Issues/Foreign-Policy . Thank you, again, for writing.
Sincerely, Barack Obama”
It’s worse than I thought! It would appear this President is no better than the last, and perhaps even more willing to be worse than Woodrow Wilson by lying and never coming clean!
so I wrote another letter that I have yet to hear back from to Obama:
David Joseph Lango
2448 Barry Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90064-2948
July 15, 2012
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington DC 20500
Dear President Obama,
Thank you for establishing a correspondence by writing me back. I addressed our bad foreign policy in my first letter. In your reply, you indicated support for the United Nations. I am inspired to be more specific in detailing why our foreign policy is bad. I was alarmed to read your idea is to continue our bad foreign policy.
We the people do not want “to live in peace and security”, if I may quote you out of context. If you would replace the word “security”, with the word “liberty”, I could calm down more easily, and trust we are heading in the right direction.
There is a current public worry that our Republic is heading in the wrong direction!
Our U.S. Constitution that you are to uphold, does not share your effort toward worldwide poverty and war, with the United Nations in charge of it all.
The very existence of the United Nations is an affront to the sovereignty of the United States of America. It should be dismantled, not “strengthened”.
In the United States of America, the Korean war was initially described by President Harry S. Truman as a “police action” as it was conducted under the auspices of the United Nations. That was WHEN our foreign policy became bad. Since then our economy became bad because of globalization. I am pleading a case for LIBERTY.
We need a non-interventionist foreign policy.
We need to shrink Uncle Sam.
If Congress only passed balanced budgets, wealth would build in the U.S. Treasury. Free markets could establish interest rates, instead of the Fed. The States can compete in improving education by eliminating the Department of Education.
I recommend taking advice from Representative Dr. Ron Paul, from Texas. He has a good plan for Uncle Sam, a LOT of good ideas.
That’s the kind of freedom I hope our government defends.
Reopening all of the military bases that we have closed here in the U.S. and bringing our troops home, would boost local economies. Just that right there, closing our military bases abroad, and stopping all foreign aid, would help Congress more easily pass a balanced budget.
Your greatest achievement could be strength, peace, and liberty for the United States, instead of helping the U.S. “globally” fall off of a fiscal cliff, trying to fund warfare and welfare, for the entire planet, succumbing to the United Nations.
It’s common knowledge that big banks fund both sides of war throughout history, and that the United Nations is rife with agenda from rich powerful secret societies.
You, Barack, are at the helm.
You can take your foot off the gas, ease on the brakes, and steer us back in the right direction.
You are welcome.
I have yet to hear back. I suspect instead there is a twenty four hour task force maintaining vigilance of my whereabouts. One of these weekends I’ll leave my phone at the other place just to keep ‘em honest. I hear Obama doesn’t need a man on the ground to verify, he just pushes the button on a cell signal for a drone strike. The rest of the world hates the U.S.A. because of drone warfare, not sure if you were aware… but this “empire building” is recorded in history as a bad thing, and our great nation has lost it’s self determination, and has been led down the garden path.
Good. Now WRITE CONGRESS!
(who is your Congressman in the House of Representatives http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/ )
(Always put your name and address at the very top and the date)
Dear Representative (insert the name of your Representative to Congress)
Please pass a balanced Federal Budget. We need to defend our nation, not police the entire planet. Navigating the complexity of your job will be much easier with a moral compass heading pointed at “less government”, to protect our Liberty. Do not approve any more overspending. Stop funding war so our troops can come home and defend our borders.
Abolish or at least greatly reduce funding for large Federal Government Agencies like DHS, TSA, FEMA, EPA, DOE, HUD, Dept. of Commerce, Dept. of Education, and stop all contributions to the United Nations.
Do not start by cutting border security or social security like the present administration does, not unlike the temper tantrum of a despot, using punishment to retain tyrannical power.
Many will say writing letters does no good. Many believe we should march on Washington D.C. NOW!
I believe we need a paper trail on behalf of everyone to validate reviving the American Revolution.
However if tyranny becomes bold enough to use it’s war powers on the people, that will be time for actually pulling triggers. History is littered with examples that governments are capable of that, so don’t say it couldn’t happen here!
Now is the time to discuss this ideology. Nazi Germany passed on this chance, which would have been word of mouth.
Register to vote America. A letter that does not have the name and address of a registered voter at the top, can legally be thrown in the trash. You can also use email, or call on the phone. I recommend an actual letter, delivered by the Post Office. It’s a tangible word from you, that can be carried to the floor and shared.
Writing letters is the least you can do.
Run for local, State, and Federal office… be a Delegate…perform honest documented investigative journalism… IMPORTANT THINGS!
There is a rising awareness of State RESPONSIBILITY toward nullification of unconstitutional Federal desires, that we the people can declare is NOT law, simply because it doesn’t fall into the enumerated responsibilities in Article 1, Section 8, of what our Federal Gov’t is allowed, and nullification is required in Article 10, to abolish the trespasses of the central gov’t when they overstep those enumerated bounds. The few rights among others enumerated in the Bill of Rights assumed there were more, and listed the basics!
So the citizens living in the States, command a laundry list of rights that is limitless! Remember that. It’s the Gov’t that is supposed to be limited in it’s power, not you or your rights!
The Federal Gov’t should not be able to claim supremacy using commerce clauses, as sovereignty belongs to the States, and through the States, citizens have granted only very limited, ENUMERATED powers, to a SMALL central gov’t. When that central Gov’t oversteps it’s bounds, we are bound by DUTY to abolish it! The government should fear it’s people, not the other way around!
I met Ron Paul, read his book “End the Fed”, and am disappointed he isn’t President.
If I were elected President, I would look for advice from Ron Paul instead of a communist like Valerie Jarrett.
Here is Dr. Benjamin Carson, Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery at John Hopkins at our National Prayer Breakfast, describing the big fix for what ails our Land of the Free and Home of the Brave.
Unfortunately, Ben Carson is not going to get my vote if he runs, unless he changes his position and embraces the 2nd Amendment.
“… Arms … discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and
preserve order in the world as well as property…. Horrid mischief
would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived the use of them.”
- Thomas Paine
“The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature.
They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit
crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for
the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent
homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence
than an armed man.”
- Thomas Jefferson
“To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them.”
- George Mason
“A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves … and include all men capable of bearing arms.”
- Richard Henry Lee
“What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment
of a standing army, the bane of liberty …. Whenever Governments mean
to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to
destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins.”
- Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who
approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but
downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The
great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might
have a gun.”
- Patrick Henry
“This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty…. The right
of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has
been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest
limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of
the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext
whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the
brink of destruction.”
- St. George Tucker
And if you don’t think it hasn’t already happened, then revisit how they confiscated our guns during the Katrina disaster in New Orleans a few years back. Many of those citizens, even ones with original purchase receipts, never got their guns back.
Wisconsin’s Sheriff Clarke, hundreds of U.S. sheriffs have said they will not participate in gun confiscation
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/see-police-confiscate-guns-from-americans/#Hs3fEFBQC7xLJByL.99
Write your locally elected Sheriff. It is our locally elected sheriff who has the U.S. Constitutional authority to enforce the law. Organizing the militia to overthrow tyranny is our bottom line option that needs to be discussed.
Here is a view point you won’t find on television:
And this guy, I like this one, he’s done some honest investigative journalism, we just need to work out the bias. We need the unbiased part. This “young turks” fellow has it going on:
The revolution we need can only be accomplished by curing the root cause. Easier said than done, to “end the Fed”! If everyone stopped borrowing money, it would be the banker that gets “laid off” instead of you or me. Our founders admitted it would take a virtuous society for a constitutional republic to flourish. The conversation is perverted, and a contract with a bank for any amount of time, save 30 years, is nothing short of indentured slavery. Think about it. Once the short term discomfort passes, the long term benefit is wealth building in the treasury, our money being worth more as time went by instead, and paying cash for your home like I did. Yeah I did. It’s pretty sweet. If not for property taxes I would be free and independent!
If our outgo exceeds our income our upkeep will be our downfall.
And use word of mouth. Ask strangers: “How about those Chemtrails?” We need to reach those on the “inside” who are doing this for the establishment. We all need to stop living their lies.